Action 52: The Feature

Obvious observation, but I wouldn't be properly respecting the craft should it go unmentioned: I love it how they used the exact same graphics from the previous game. By the time whoever was making this thing got this far into it, they pretty much just threw up their arms and said "yeah, I don't care either."

Armor is basically a game where two players are required, and tanks... it's like that two-player only space game I can't remember, but instead of auto movement to one part of the screen, you shoot in a slightly different angle sometimes. And, nine hits later... With this game there is...

You know what, I've grown weary of writing about Action 52 for now, and I'll attempt to convey what the game allegedly inspires: spite and lack of faith in humanity. Besides that, see you at number 43 for some more analysis.

Chances are if you're reading this, you're living in a country with some kind of decidedly democratic/republican tilt to the way it does things, or at least it claims such. And that's okay, but every person of sensible judgment should know such rights are not to be extended to everyone. The following is a comprehensive list of people who should be forever barred from participating in any sort of process. This includes decision-making and electoral processes at even the lowest levels like dog catcher and intra-household debates.

1) Felons. Part of their punishment. Let them know they permanently owe a debt to society.

3) Anybody who has ever used the phrases "sheeple" or "Hollywoodization" with a straight face. Such intellectual wanking can only dilute good righteousness.

4) Anybody with an account at CheatCC. And Gamefaqs as well, just to be safe. Can't take chances by giving leet-speaking Cloud n' Chrono yaoi writers a finger in the process.

5) Anybody with an account at Townhall, Free Republic or the One People's Project. Lesser political minds clearly don't know what's good for them.

6) Left wing bloviating, babbling, blogging blowhards to pine to the hills for more lenient criminal punishments for everybody, yet foam at the mouth when a cop caught practicing racial profiling isn't burnt at the stake. As long as their freedom of speech corrupts them, their mental fortitude and integrity is not one for such responsibilities.

8) Anybody who considers themselves fans of Internet assholes/hostility rods (think Maddox, Angry VG Nerd, Tucker Max). The craniums of those with sound minds are equipped to repel such silly excuses for entertainment.

10) Anybody with an IQ below 130. If this truth is anything but self-evident to you, you're clearly disqualified for this purpose.

11) Anybody not named Afton. There's just something genetically untrustworthy about such people without this name.

12) Anybody who doesn't man a freakishly obtusely-named domain. Something about lacking this initiative screams "not suitable for power or even anything at all."